Believe it or not, the launching of this site places us at risk including fines and imprisonment.

And to Bill Clinton, Janet Reno, and all the congresspersons who signed and supported this excuse for legislation, we say, quite simply, "fuck you."

The predictable irony is that the Government and a dinosaur-like American media machine will now do everything in their power to declare that challenging this provision, using a multimedia format that defies the journalistic trappings of prior media models, may be deliberately litigious or, as one observer has opined, a cunning PR maneuver. Yeah…thank God for the CDA…nothing like a human right violation to gain brand recognition. To those observers, we say, quite simply, "fuck you."

So all these Neanderthals alike have no option other than to admit culpability for the very legislation inspiring the communication of its menacing presence (as well as their scare-mongering and inaccurate coverage of it) as a virtue of journalistic responsibility. And its challenge in court, a necessity that they were either too chickenshit or too uninformed to take on.

Our mode of communication recognizes the value of art, creativity, and sensory stimulation using multimedia mechanisms, as ideally suited for cross cultural communication. Our very purpose requires that the aegis of the First Amendment be extended to protect our aims and principles as imperative to maintaining the foundations of the Constitution itself.

The web site serves to foster participation and reduce apathy, both of which are fundamental to true democracy, and to illustrate how and why limitations on expression are unacceptable. We gladly take on this risk.